Quantcast


A few months ago when Eddie House was traded to the Knicks for Nate Robinson I wrote how we would miss Eddie's presence on the team. I think most would agree that has been the case. Apart from his production on the court, Eddie was a joy to watch. He was a great clubhouse guy which is a huge cliché but is actually really important to a team's success. With Eddie the Celtics were never out of a game. Every 3 he hit was followed by a raucous cheer by the Boston Garden crowd similar to what Scal gets every time he touches the ball.

Eddie was the definition of an X-factor. He had no fear and made big shots in big moments. He played his heart out every game. It's a shame that certain other players don't play with his passion. Sure, Nate Robinson might be a better overall player, but it doesn't matter if he averaged 20 points a game he'd never replace Eddie.

There is no sport where role players are more important than in basketball. What are the 90's Bulls without Steve Kerr or John Paxson? The Lakers without Horry? The Pistons without Tayshaun Prince? You can't just go out and get these guys at a yard sale, they are tough to find.

We made a poor decision getting rid of Eddie. Sports aren't just about wins and losses it's about forming bonds and connections with your team and your favorite players. I don't know if the Celtics would be better off right now with Eddie. What I do know is that whether or not the Celtics win this year, I would've enjoyed the ride a lot more with Eddie House on the team.

Karl Dillinger 4/15/2010 12:07:00 PM Edit
_________________________________________________________________________________________
« Prev Post Next Post »

More Celtics News via Bleacher Report


More Celtics Life Features

Click here for Celtics videos.

Click here for Celtics wallpapers.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

comments powered by Disqus

5 Responses so far.

  1. Margaret says:

    I couldn't agree more - I loved when Eddie played, and he especially came through in playoff games...

  2. Anonymous says:

    So why did they get rid of Eddie? What do you think were some of the real reasons?

  3. tb727 says:

    i thought nate wouldve brought more to the table. Not even close. I do miss Eddie myself.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Eddie was all and all a great player who brought great energy to the team and the fans as well. He is a great guy to take those shots and would make them even if he had not much playing time he would come thru in clutch situations!! We will never know how our season would of been with Eddie still in the picture. I enjoy Nate Robinson he plays well, but lacks that energy. I believe we thru off our dynamic by getting rid of a young player who proved himself over and over and getting old Rasheed who is almost always the last up the court and cant hit a three to save his life in clutch times. DRIVE THE BALL!!!

  5. Anonymous says:

    eddie was great celtic , hitting threes when they needed it. rasheed was a bad move should of kept powe and Start looking for younger talent and better bench and they should be a winning team dere go C's!

Post a Comment

    Powered by Blogger.