![]() |
| "So far we've agreed to not look at each other, and to shake hands in an unconventional manner." |
![]() |
| "Varejão and me, we're gonna fuck you up." |
![]() |
| "Hey if I had to sell one of my yachts, I would have done the same thing." |
![]() |
| Paid exorbitantly... to dunk on the Clippers. |
What's worse is that there is a sense of assumed blame that the owners just don't want to take. Who's at fault for the loss of revenues? Certainly not the players, they are getting bigger, stronger, faster, etc. it seems, as time goes on, and therefore theoretically more fun to watch. And you can't blame them, again, because they are chosen by the owners and management. If I hire a turtle to run my assembly line, no one's going to come to me like, "Wow, that turtle is really fucking everything up, are you sure he's been reporting to on-the-job training?" They're going to be more or less like, "Why the hell did you hire a turtle? You do realize that it's a fucking turtle, right?" My point is, the league is failing because of what the owners are doing or not doing. So why is it the players who have to make the sacrifice?
Here's a couple radical ideas for the NBA owners and executives that I think might help them.
![]() |
| "What do we want? 'An NBA team in Albuquerque, New Mexico!' Why do we want it? 'It's fucking hot out!'" |
- The "darts at a map of the USA" is not working, as far as city selection for your teams. Um, Charlotte? Oklahoma City? Why don't we throw one up in Boise, Idaho while we're at it. You know the South Dakota Badlands don't have a team... How about California 1, California 2, California 3? Yea David Lee called, he said he's sick of playing for Golden State cause he can't practice without having to dodge the rebounds from Blake Griffin and Pau Gasol's missed J's.
- When people confuse your league with the WWE, that's a bad thing. This is hole they've been digging for themselves for a while, and it's going to take some time before anyone really trusts them. Everyone who follows the NBA watches with a certain degree of suspicion. Personally, I believe there's game-fixing going on. It was proved, although completely ignored, that the last dunk contest was a fix. Letting the best team win to maximize profits may seem counter intuitive when the Milwaukee Sucks win it all, but maybe, just maybe, if people thought they were watching a true sport, and not a reality show packed with tall people, there would be more interest. You force your big-name teams to win, you lose interest from all the other markets in the country, those teams' ticket and merchandising revenues fall, they can't spend as much on players so it becomes even less likely for them to win, and the cycle perpetuates. In the end, all you get is 22 markets who's teams don't have a chance, of course the fans don't give a fuck, of course you are going to lose money. What isn't the Sterninator getting? I mean, 47 FTA discrepancy in 5 playoff games against the team with the most buzz in the league? Not still bitter, I'm just saying...
- Oust David Stern and Donald Sterling. These two jerk-offs have reputations that wouldn't improve even if they grew angel wings and flew to third-world countries to save dying children with magic rays of sunshine from their glowing halos. No fans of the NBA appreciate Stern ruining the game of basketball in this country and acting like a smug little fuckasaurus rex pretending to give a rat's ass about anything other than accumulating wealth. And no fans of humanity appreciate such a scumbag like Sterling being continually rewarded and defended by the league for his constant irresponsibility.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
« Prev Post
Next Post »











Amazing. I agree. Please write more.
agree with Karl. this is an inspired masterpiece. this needs to reach the NBA fast.
This is a must read for every fan, player and owner. Awesome piece.
Who here doesn't love an article like that? D. STERN and D. STERliNg perhaps.
Hate-masterpiece!
Well-written and entertaining. I like your 3 points to get the deal done.
And owners truly are a baffling bunch. Like the Nets sign Travis Outlaw to an atrocity of a contract and then 3 months later...are trying to move the albatross contract that is Travis Outlaw. You JUST gave it to him, morons!!
I think this ASSHOLE missed the point of the lockout as far as the owners are concerned. You can agree with this ASSHOLE or the player or the owner but Travis Outlaw's contract is not the problem, it's the BRI split - 57-43 in favor of the players. Why the owners agreed to that is in IMO beyond STUPID. If you take out every bad contract and pretend they aren't there, the players still received the same amount of money. This year the owners didn't spend as much on contracts and owe the players and additional $228M (or in that neighborhood)to meet the 57% BRI.
Hey Mark Acres!!
@badax33 let's not resort to capital name-calling, you shit-eating semen-sucker. haha, anyways, we can get into this a little more I guess. You write about the BRI split like it's some ridiculous ratio. The NFL players get 60% of football-related revenue, and that league (although previously mired in other disagreements) is doing incredibly well.
There's one sentence you wrote that's particularly retarded. [If you take out all the bad contracts, the players all still make the same amount of money]. Why would the players bother signing contracts if that were true? If you void all the bad contracts, the players do still make BRI money, but less than they would have with their additional contract money. Here's the long and short of it: the owners claim they are losing too much money, saying teams lost a combined $380 million last year. The players are calling bullshit on that, and here's why. The last season has been the biggest revenue season for the NBA in years. It was the most watched season since 98-99 (http://www.adweek.com/news/television/tnt-espnabc-draw-record-nba-ratings-130751?page=1). Why wasn't this shit being brought up by the owners in 08-09? Better yet, how did they agree to a CBA in 05, back when they were doing terribly, that somehow is losing them money now that they have record revenues for this century? The Warriors sold for $450m dollars last summer... yet it's losing money hand over fist? Smells like bullshit to me, especially since the owners won't even open their accounting books to the courts. It's so easy to prove your point when you can just make the numbers up! Enron did it and got away with murder for a while.
Also, owners want a hard salary cap. Um, just DON'T OFFER INSANE CONTRACTS! Problem solved. So they're worried that one rogue owner will start signing dumb-ass contracts and that will cause player-inflation (and it would) come up with something that punishes that OWNER not the players.
This is the way it always happens in pro sports. The owners hate each other, signing guys to big contracts trying to pry this guy or that guy away from another team. They overspend trying to out-do each other and win championships. Then after they've caused the cost of signing talent to go through the roof, these former enemies all unite in a big sobfest, crying about expensive it has become. Boo-fucking-hoo, it's your own fucking fault. In this case, it's clear to me that the owners finally got a taste of what success is like, but it wasn't as lucrative as they expected cause their overspending went rampant, now they want an "undo" button. I say, "go fuck yourselves."
This was a really nice post. Very informative about the lockout, and you bring up alot of good points to back up what you're saying...
Can't wait for it all to end so we can get the offseason really rolling already